CVE-2021-3450
7.4 HIGHThe X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain
Published: 2021-03-25 · Last updated: 2026-06-17
Severity and scoring
- CVSS
- 7.4 HIGH
- Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- CWE
- CWE-295
Affected products
| Vendor | Product |
|---|---|
| fedoraproject | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| freebsd | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| mcafee | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| netapp | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| nodejs | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| openssl | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| oracle | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| sonicwall | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| tenable | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
| windriver | capture_client, cloud_volumes_ontap_mediator, commerce_guided_search |
Description
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).
Source: NVD
References
- [NVD]https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3450
- [Other]http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1
- [Other]http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2
- [Other]http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3
- [Other]http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4
- [Other]https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- [Other]https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b
- [Other]https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845
- [Other]https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10356
- [Other]https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP/
- [Vendor advisory]https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2021-March/000198.html
- [Other]https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0013
- [Other]https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-21:07.openssl.asc
- [Other]https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-03
- [Other]https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210326-0006/
- [Other]https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-2021-GHY28dJd
- [Vendor advisory]https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- [Other]https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-05
- [Other]https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-08
- [Other]https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
- [Other]http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1
- [Other]http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2
- [Other]http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3
- [Other]http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4
- [Other]https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- [Other]https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b
- [Other]https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845
- [Other]https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10356
- [Other]https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP/
- [Vendor advisory]https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2021-March/000198.html
- [Other]https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0013
- [Other]https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-21:07.openssl.asc
- [Other]https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-03
- [Other]https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210326-0006/
- [Other]https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-2021-GHY28dJd
- [Vendor advisory]https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- [Patch]https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- [Other]https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-05
- [Other]https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-08
- [Other]https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
Related CVEs
Same vendor
- CVE-2026-35273 — Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Updates Environment Management) (9.8 CRITICAL)
- CVE-2026-9076 — Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap) processes attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen s... (7.5 HIGH)
- CVE-2026-7383 — Issue summary: A signed integer overflow when sizing the destination buffer for Unicode output in ASN1_mbstring_ncopy() can lead to a hea... (8.1 HIGH)
- CVE-2026-45447 — Issue summary: A specially crafted PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed message could trigger a use-after-free during PKCS#7 signature verification (8.8 HIGH)
- CVE-2026-45446 — Issue summary: The implementations of AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) mishandle the authentication of AAD (Additional Authe... (4.8 MEDIUM)
Same CWE
- CVE-2025-71261 — An attacker with network-level access between the SUSE Virtualization and Rancher Manager in SUSE Harvester before 1.8.0 could interfere... (8.6 HIGH)
- CVE-2026-9259 — Improper validation of server certificates in Canon EOS Network Setting Tool Version 1.5.0 or earlier (6.5 MEDIUM)
- CVE-2026-9258 — Improper validation of SSH host keys in Canon EOS Network Setting Tool Version 1.5.0 or earlier (6.5 MEDIUM)
- CVE-2026-45388 — In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the client implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the server, which allows imp... (9.1 CRITICAL)
- CVE-2026-45170 — Idira Privilege Cloud Connector versions prior 1.1.100504 under specific conditions and configuration scenarios, TLS certificate validati...