Services
One engagement. Continuous shield. Your business modules, scoped in.
Red-teaming as a continuous engagement — not a one-off pentest, not a SaaS scanner. Your environment, your business modules, your risk profile. Same compression, same proof, signed.
Two phases. One continuous shield.
Phase 1 — Assessment
An active one-time engagement that maps your environment, identifies the highest-risk surfaces, and produces working evidence. The deliverable is yours regardless of whether you continue.
Phase 2 — Continuous engagement
After assessment, the partnership matures into continuous adversarial intelligence: monitoring, quarterly re-assessment, new-CVE relevance alerts, tradecraft refresh from active engagement work. The posture stays defended as the environment evolves.
Most prospects test the relationship through the assessment before signing the continuous partnership.
Four macro-categories of cybersecurity coverage
Cybersecurity surfaces decompose into four orthogonal macro-categories. An engagement selects depth per pillar — most QSearch partnerships compose across all four.
Technical domains
Where the surface lives. An engagement specifies which technical domain the coverage targets, end-to-end.
- Systems and infrastructure
- Network security
- Application security
- Cloud security
- Endpoint, OT, and IoT
Operational functions
How coverage is delivered against the surface. Offensive testing is the engagement's gravity; defensive, intelligence, and incident-response functions compose around it.
- Offensive security
- Defensive — Security Operations Center
- Digital forensics and incident response
- Threat intelligence
- Cryptography and AI security
Governance and compliance
The control layer regulators read. Mapped to the European and Swiss expectations a buyer in scope of FADP, GDPR, EU AI Act, DORA, or NIS2 has to cross.
- GRC framework
- Privacy and data protection
- Sectoral compliance
- Risk and audit
- Supply chain risk
People and processes
Where security meets the team running the business. The pillar that keeps coverage from regressing the day after a control ships.
- Security awareness
- Identity and access management
- Data security
- DevSecOps
- Physical and crisis
Four dimensions inside operational offensive
When the engagement leans offensive, four orthogonal dimensions specify how it runs. Each dimension is a choice; the combination is the engagement contract.
Gray-box · White-box · Assumed-breach. Black-box is too generic to surface real risk inside the time the engagement runs.
Cyber · Physical · Social · Wireless. Composed against the buyer's actual threat model, not a generic checklist.
Continuous (RTaaS) · Adversary emulation. The continuous mode is the default; the emulation mode anchors to a specific threat actor's TTPs.
TIBER-EU · TLPT (DORA) · CBEST · iCAST. The framework anchors the engagement to the regulator's expectations for adversarial assurance.
Continuous engagement model
The operating mode. Snapshot pentests answer a question that’s already changed. Continuous engagement answers the one in front of you.
Post-assessment monitoring
After the assessment ships, monitoring activates on your engagement scope. New attack surface, new exposures, new credential leaks — you hear about them on our cadence, not on the next audit cycle.
Quarterly re-assessment cadence
Re-assessment runs every quarter, or on event-driven triggers your environment defines. The posture is verified, not assumed.
CVE-relevance alerts
Our CVE Watch surface annotates every published CVE against your engagement scope. When a new CVE matters for your stack, you know it the day it publishes.
Tradecraft refresh
Quarterly tradecraft refresh from active engagement learnings. The platform that defends your posture today is sharper than the one that started the engagement.
Continuous security awareness
Awareness operates on the same cadence as the testing — phishing-simulation refreshes, sector-specific scenarios, and tradecraft narratives that match what we just saw in the wild.
Continuous testing
Testing is not a phase that closes. New routes, new modules, new third-party dependencies enter the engagement scope as they ship, not at the next contract.
The economics
Continuous engagement is structurally cheaper than the equivalent series of snapshot pentests, and structurally more useful. The total cost of coverage is lower; the coverage itself is denser.
AI Security (cross-cutting)
AI-system adversarial testing folds into the four pillars wherever your stack uses LLMs, vector stores, agentic systems, or RAG pipelines. Prompt injection, model extraction, training-data leakage, agentic privilege escalation, supply-chain compromise across the model lifecycle. We scope it into the relevant pillar(s) rather than treat it as a peer module — because that’s how the threat actually surfaces.
NIST PQ migration: CRYSTALS-Kyber for key encapsulation, Dilithium for digital signatures, SPHINCS+ for hash-based signing, FALCON for lattice signatures. Migration assessment and transition planning operate inside our engagements today — not as a roadmap promise, as present-tense capability.
Model robustness testing with Foolbox, ART, and CleverHans methodology. Prompt injection resistance evaluation. Training-data poisoning detection. Active where your stack uses LLMs, vector retrieval, classifiers, or any model whose output directs a business decision.
Vibe coding security
Security review for codebases shipped from rapid AI-pair-programming workflows. We audit the implicit trust boundaries: prompt-generated authentication, AI-suggested validation logic, copy-pasted dependency choices. The goal is keeping the velocity of the workflow without inheriting the failure modes.
Cloud and infrastructure
Cloud-perimeter testing across AWS, GCP, Azure. IAM drift detection, exposed-credential checks, infrastructure-as-code review, lateral-movement paths from a foothold. Composed with the four pillars wherever your environment relies on managed cloud services.
Engineering for IP
The moat. The capability that compounds.
We engineer our own tradecraft and tooling. Every engagement compounds the next. Internal META-tools synthesize cross-engagement intelligence — adversary patterns persist across customers, the platform sharpens against real-world adversaries, and the tradecraft refines on a cadence the buyer never has to think about. Continuous engagement is what makes this real: the platform learns from every active engagement, and every continuous customer benefits from the aggregate. This is the capability the established product-shaped offerings don’t have visibly — their offering is a product; ours is an IP-compounding partnership.
What an engagement actually looks like.
An executive walkthrough of how we run an engagement, end-to-end — cosa facciamo, the outcomes you can expect, the gates every finding crosses. Operational methodology is the proprietary layer; the framework is what we walk through with you before you sign.
1. Scope
Discovery call, engagement-scoping conversation, scope ruling produced. You see exactly what we’re going to do before we start.
2. Discover
Asset and surface inventory across the agreed scope. The map of what an attacker can reach.
3. Test
Module-specific adversarial testing across selected pillars. Findings produced with working evidence.
4. Verify
Every candidate finding crosses four sequential verification gates: demonstrable exploitation, technical verification, adversarial review, pre-delivery audit. Nothing ships unverified.
5. Deliver
Signed engagement report, partnership handoff, continuous-engagement onramp where applicable. The deliverable carries the founder’s signature.
An executive walkthrough is available under NDA. Internal denominations of methodology stay internal — the IP boundary is what makes the partnership defensible.
Four sequential gates before any finding reaches you.
Each candidate finding moves through four sequential verification gates. The first establishes demonstrable exploitation — no theory, no observation-only claims. The second is technical verification with documented evidence. The third is adversarial review: every finding tested against the strongest counter-arguments before it survives. The fourth is pre-delivery audit, where the finding is checked against the engagement scope ruling and the deliverable contract.
Internal denominations and operational criteria are part of the proprietary methodology. Executive walkthrough available under NDA.
Composed around your environment. Signed by the founder.
Discovery call costs nothing. The founder picks up.